Verification note: Sources listed on this page support only the statements they are cited for. If you find a statement here that no listed source supports, tell us and we will correct or remove it.
Price benchmark not verified for this entry; request a grade-specific quotation.
Volume programmes needing predictable performance and consistent supply at a controlled cost.
Not for products making a plant-based or bio-based claim. Not for compostability claims.
Honest about what it is: a synthetic sheet with recycled input. Often outperforms plant-input alternatives on abrasion and wet-rub while carrying a substantiable GRS percentage. The failure mode here is marketing, not material — it gets sold as ‘eco leather’, which is exactly the kind of generic claim ECGT prohibits from 27 September 2026.

AI-generated illustration. It does not show a specific supplied grade or test result.
Its chemical rules cover only the chemicals used in processing, not those already carried in the reclaimed feedstock, and no physical performance is tested. Ask which version a certificate was audited against; 5.0 becomes mandatory for audits from 31 December 2026.

AI-generated illustration. It does not show a specific supplied grade or test result.
A chemical safety certificate, not an environmental one — a virgin fossil-based PVC sheet can hold a valid one. Because certification is modular, check whether the certificate covers the finished article you are buying or only a yarn, trim or component of it.

AI-generated illustration. It does not show a specific supplied grade or test result.
APPROVED covers a component while PRODUCT covers a finished article with at least 90% approved textile input; the two are quoted interchangeably and are not the same claim. Neither says anything about recycled or bio-based content.